Q-Anon, Navy Ship Collisions and a Tiny Chinese Chip

The Bloomberg article describes how a tiny Chinese chip was placed in the supply chain for over 30 major US companies. It states, “Amazon reported the discovery to U.S. authorities, sending a shudder through the intelligence community. Elemental’s servers could be found in Department of Defense data centers, the CIA’s drone operations, and the onboard networks of Navy warships.

Based Q’s drop mentioning “Navy ship crashes,” I decided to research some recent incidents involving Navy ships.

Accident #1

February 1, 2017 – USS Antietam, a Ticonderoga class guided missile cruiser, ran aground and leaked hydraulic oil while attempting to anchor in Tokyo Bay. While no one was injured, damage was done to the propellers to a sufficient degree to cause the leakage of hydraulic oil. It was able to return to base with the help of tug boats. A report of the incident said, “The ship grounded after anchoring out in high winds, officials said. When the crew noticed the ship was dragging its anchor, Antietam got back underway. Shortly after, the crew felt the ship shudder and lose all pitch control in both propellers. “ [2]

Accident #2

May 9, 2017 – USS Lake Champlain, also a Ticondoroga class guided missile cruiser, collided with a 60 foot fishing vessel named Nan Yang 50 in the Sea of Japan. The weather was overcast, with visibility ranging from three to nine nautical miles throughout the morning. The ship was operating in formation along with an aircraft carrier and a South Korean vessel. All of LAKE CHAMPLAIN’s military radars were operational; however, the ship’s commercial radar display on the bridge was not operational due to a system casualty. LAKE CHAMPLAIN was not transmitting its Automatic Identification System (AIS) information, which provides a ship’s location, course, speed, and other pertinent information to nearby vessels. It was not until 10:50 am that LAKE CHAMPLAIN gained radar track and electro-optical sight sensor on NAM YANG 502, at a range of 4.7 nautical miles. For approximately the next 45 minutes, LAKE CHAMPLAIN held intermittent track on NAM YANG 502.

At 11:35 am, LAKE CHAMPLAIN lost radar track on NAM YANG 502, which was then operating at a range of 2.4 nautical miles. While changing course to maintain relative position with the escorted aircraft carrier, LAKE CHAMPLAIN turned in front of the fishing vessel without realizing the risk of collision.

The Navy’s official report concludes, “The LAKE CHAMPLAIN crew was ultimately unprepared for the situation in which they found themselves through a lack of preparation, ineffective command and control, and deficiencies in training.”

Additionally, NAM YANG 502’s global positioning system (GPS) and radio were not functional, which contributed to the collision. [3]

Accident #3

June 19, 2017 2:20 a.m. – Navy destroyer USS Fitzgerald collided with a Philippine flagged container ship named ACX Crystal off the coast of Japan. Killed 7 sailors and injured several others. Weather was clear, but traffic in the area was heavy. The ACX Crystal’s route, provided by vessel-tracking service MarineTraffic, shows that the ship made a sudden turn at about 1:30 a.m., as if trying to avoid something, before continuing eastward. The ACX Crystal then made a U-turn and returned around 2:20 a.m. to the area of the collision. [4]

The Navy’s official findings were that the Officer on Deck (3rd in command) failed to recognize the potential of collision and take evasive action. As it was the crossing vessel, the burden was on it to do so. However, Crystal also failed to take evasive action. The official report doesn’t mention Crystal’s erratic track before the collision, as shown above. Is that because it didn’t want to disclose to the public that (1.) Some component of the ship, perhaps a navigation aid, failed to show the impending collision correctly because a Chinese chip had been implanted? Or (2.) Some component of the Crystal contained a Chinese chip that somehow caused a collision with the American ship?

Accident #4

August 21, 2017 – USS John McCain, a guided missile destroyer,  made a “sudden turn,” colliding with a commercial tanker in Singapore territorial waters and resulting in the deaths of 10 U.S. sailors. The rapid change in direction unintentionally increased the rate of the vessel’s turn, putting it in the path of the Liberian-flagged tanker Alnic MC, the bureau’s report said.

The Navy’s official report of the incident states, “The collision between John S. McCain and Alnic MC was also avoidable and resulted primarily from complacency, over-confidence and lack of procedural compliance. A major contributing factor to the collision was sub-standard level of knowledge regarding the operation of the ship control console.”


[1] Bloomberg.Com. 2018. “China Used a Tiny Chip in a Hack That Infiltrated U.S. Companies,” October 4, 2018. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate-america-s-top-companies.

[2] Larter, David. 2017. “Officials: Navy Cruiser Ran Aground near Japan.” Navy Times. August 8, 2017. https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2017/01/31/officials-navy-cruiser-ran-aground-near-japan/.

[3] Information, This story was written by Navy Office of. n.d. “Navy Releases Collision Report for USS Fitzgerald and USS John S McCain Collisions.” Accessed October 5, 2018. /submit/display.asp?story_id=103130.

[4] News, A. B. C. 2017. “What We Know about Navy Destroyer’s Deadly Collision.” ABC News. June 19, 2017. https://abcnews.go.com/US/navy-destroyers-deadly-collision-container-ship-japan/story?id=48131357.

[5] Lieu, Amy. 2018. “USS John S McCain Fatal Collision Blamed on ‘Sudden Turn’: Report.” InteractiveResource. Fox News. March 8, 2018. https://www.foxnews.com/us/uss-john-s-mccain-fatal-collision-blamed-on-sudden-turn-report.


New Inquiry Filed for 9/11 Reinvestigation

Many people know or at least suspect that the actual events of the Kennedy assassination differ from the government narrative produced by the Warren Commission. It’s been 55 years. No one really thinks of those who question the party line as “crazy conspiracy theorists” anymore. The whole event is largely fading into the sands of time.

Many people know, or at least suspect, that the actual events of 9/11 differ from the government narrative produced by the 9/11 Commission. Many people are at least curious as to how an airplane could strike the Pentagon, one of the most heavily fortified buildings on the planet, two hours after we knew we were under domestic attack. But now it’s the 21st Century. Questioners can now talk amongst themselves via social media. They can form groups and organizations. And they have. So how many of these “crazy conspiracy theorists,” these “fringe groups,” are there? They represent thousands of supporters and millions of website readers.


Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (over 3,000 architects and engineers and an additional 22,500 members of the public.)

Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice

Scientists for 9/11 Truth

Lawyers for 9/11 Truth

Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth 58 have signed petition

Commissioned and Non-commissioned US Military Officers for 9/11 Truth

Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth

Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth

Actors and Artists for 9/11 Truth

Veterans for 9/11 Truth

Marines for 9/11 Truth

Musicians for 9/11 Truth

Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth

Republicans for 9/11 Truth

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth and Unity

Worldwide Coalition for 9/11 Truth

City groups, including Boston for 9/11 Truth, Rochester

State, provincial, and regional groups including Calgary for 9/11 Truth, New York, Florida, Utah, Vermont, West Texas


And thousands more prominent individuals, such as former FBI Director Louis Freeh, have questioned the public narrative.

In fact, by 2013 a poll found that 38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11. By the end of 2016, that number had increased to half.  If half of Americans at least suspect that the 9/11 Commissions original findings, the party line, is wrong, this Grand Jury needs to be empaneled and to use its broad powers to conduct a legitimate inquiry and come to a factual conclusion.

This summer one such group, Lawyers for 9/11 Inquiry, filed a motion with the US Attorney in the Southern District of New York asking that a Grand Jury be impaneled to investigate “certain federal crimes that have been committed in your district” related to 9/11. The first petition, filed in April, has been amended to contain the following list.


Federal Law Criminalizes Acts of Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries

Federal Law Criminalizes Providing Material Support to Terrorists

Federal Law Criminalizes the Killing of a Federal Government Agent or Employee

Federal Law Criminalizes Bombings of Places of Public Use and Government Facilities

Federal Law Criminalizes Aiding and Abetting, Accessories, and Conspirators of Federal Crimes


Below are some quotes from the petition, which is 54 pages and followed by 57 Exhibits.

“Overwhelming evidence presented here demonstrates that pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries – not just airplanes or fires – destroyed three steel-framed World Trade Center buildings that day in New York City and killed so many of these people. By law, the Department of Justice through the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York must present this evidence to a grand jury. Justice for these victims requires nothing less and the soul of our nation commands it.”

“The evidence in this Petition goes well beyond rumor and innuendo. It includes forensic data, expert analysis, and eyewitness testimony from First Responders, WTC employees and by-standers who were on the scene at the time of the attacks.”

“The Lawyer’s Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence, including the evidentiary materials attached hereto and referenced herein, and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries to destroy WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC7 in New York City on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed.”

Lisa Cahill